Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Sonoma County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 295
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $2,655,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tom Crane | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $16,724 |
62 | John And William Brazil | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $16,052 |
63 | Joe Pozzi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $16,042 |
64 | Alvin J Hansen | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $15,750 |
65 | Adelino B Alves | Petaluma, CA 94955 | $15,114 |
66 | L Corda & Sons | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $14,814 |
67 | Albert Mello Jr | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $14,395 |
68 | Ocean View Farms | Windsor, CA 95492 | $13,914 |
69 | D J Or Lynda Carinalli | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $13,689 |
70 | Joe Pinheiro | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $13,601 |
71 | Ramiro And Jane Avila | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $13,032 |
72 | Domenico Carinalli Jr | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $12,938 |
73 | John Camozzi | Rohnert Park, CA 94928 | $12,938 |
74 | Manuel A Brazil | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $12,884 |
75 | John Taverna | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $12,495 |
76 | Beretta Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $12,353 |
77 | Colleen Briggs | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $12,344 |
78 | Alfred Martinoni | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $12,128 |
79 | St Anthony Farms Inc | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $12,060 |
80 | Gambonini Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $11,970 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”