Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Sonoma County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 221
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $3,726,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dutton Bros Farming | Graton, CA 95444 | $9,161 |
82 | , | $8,862 | |
83 | Isaac Sullens | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $8,405 |
84 | Joe Thornburgh | Sebastopol, CA 95473 | $8,103 |
85 | Susan Devoto | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $7,905 |
86 | Robert Monckton II | Guerneville, CA 95446 | $7,028 |
87 | James Blankinship | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $6,718 |
88 | Mike Ramondo | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $6,682 |
89 | David Hale | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $6,513 |
90 | C Beck Inc | Bodega Bay, CA 94923 | $6,383 |
91 | R C Conger | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $6,072 |
92 | Jefferey F Genovese | Bodega Bay, CA 94923 | $5,830 |
93 | Haven Best | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $5,511 |
94 | Thomas Graham | Bodega, CA 94922 | $5,437 |
95 | Owen Paul Sunke | Forestville, CA 95436 | $5,415 |
96 | Catherine Reyes | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $4,914 |
97 | Daniel L Lazzari | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $4,006 |
98 | Keith C Gilmore | Cazadero, CA 95421 | $3,524 |
99 | Gertrude Duckhorn | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $3,365 |
100 | Herbert Upham | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $2,839 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”