Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Sonoma County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 117
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $1,687,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Nick Buttke-nick And Amber Buttke Dairy | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $1,793 |
82 | Petaluma Pumpkin Patch LLC | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $1,627 |
83 | Paul Mitterbach | Cloverdale, CA 95425 | $1,530 |
84 | Steve Riebli Ranch LLC | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $1,400 |
85 | Samuel Zanoline | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $1,393 |
86 | Gilardi & Jacobsen Ag Service, Inc | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $1,333 |
87 | Furlong Ranches | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $1,264 |
88 | , | $1,190 | |
89 | , | $1,179 | |
90 | John Bles | Sprague River, OR 97639 | $1,162 |
91 | Pete J Lepori | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,142 |
92 | Robert Mcclelland Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,141 |
93 | Jessica Mary Jones | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $1,054 |
94 | Bruce Mc Glochlin | Tomales, CA 94971 | $1,004 |
95 | L Corda & Sons | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $998 |
96 | Gayleen Vieira-maas | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $991 |
97 | Martin Albini | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $962 |
98 | Andrew Cheda | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $837 |
99 | Rick Collins | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $757 |
100 | Loren Poncia | Tomales, CA 94971 | $730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”