Dairy Programs in Sonoma County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 38 of 38
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $3,792,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mulas Dairy Company | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $111,903 |
22 | Nosecchi Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $109,444 |
23 | Jeff Jones | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $105,420 |
24 | Albert Mello Jr | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $101,950 |
25 | Robert Mcclelland Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $101,047 |
26 | Domenico Carinalli Jr | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $100,814 |
27 | James Riebli Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $97,705 |
28 | Spaletta Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $95,204 |
29 | Travis Moreda | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $83,846 |
30 | Nick Buttke-nick And Amber Buttke Dairy | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $82,446 |
31 | Llano Oaks Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $81,537 |
32 | Michael Mello | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $81,339 |
33 | Charles O Morrison Dba Morrison Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $77,798 |
34 | Larry Peter | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $69,958 |
35 | Jessica Silacci Dba Jessbe Farm | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $50,945 |
36 | Steve Riebli Ranch LLC | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $48,205 |
37 | Morrison Bros Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $34,105 |
38 | Joseph Camozzi Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous