Farm Subsidy information
Sonoma County, California
Total Subsidies in Sonoma County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,677
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $235,376,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | George Mcclelland | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $314,916 |
82 | Bettinelli Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $307,960 |
83 | Lee Martinelli | Forestville, CA 95436 | $304,813 |
84 | Robert Camozzi II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $301,331 |
85 | Tom Crane | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $300,575 |
86 | Dotti Brothers LLC | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $294,994 |
87 | Richard Crane | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $292,782 |
88 | Ralph Bastian Jr | Callender, IA 50523 | $290,247 |
89 | Cunningham Dairy/ Celia Or James | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $288,688 |
90 | Ielmorini Moody Dairy | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $288,541 |
91 | , | $282,325 | |
92 | Warnecke Ranch & Vineyard II, Lp | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $278,225 |
93 | Gamlake Dairy-old Number | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $277,310 |
94 | Jacobsen Ranches | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $271,732 |
95 | , | $271,236 | |
96 | Victor Leveroni Corp | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $270,543 |
97 | Jack & Mary Dei Trust | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $269,383 |
98 | Michael J Murray | San Francisco, CA 94115 | $268,369 |
99 | David Fanucchi/fanucchi Ranch | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $267,120 |
100 | Bevill Family Trust-duffern Bevill | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $265,289 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”