Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Sonoma County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 295
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $2,655,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jack & Mary Dei Trust | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $21,321 |
42 | Joe Tresch Dairy Inc | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $21,143 |
43 | Jorge Sousa | Cotati, CA 94931 | $20,893 |
44 | Oak Ridge Angus | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $20,590 |
45 | W Terry Lindley | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $20,179 |
46 | Gary Deniz | Lakeview, OR 97630 | $19,782 |
47 | Gamlake Dairy-old Number | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $19,628 |
48 | Ielmorini Dairy Valley Ford | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $19,411 |
49 | Mazzetta Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $19,256 |
50 | Henry Perucchi & Son | Bodega, CA 94922 | $19,060 |
51 | Andrew J Camozzi III | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $18,761 |
52 | Arthur Lafranchi | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $18,311 |
53 | Robert Camozzi | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $18,244 |
54 | Petersen Brothers Dairy | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $18,175 |
55 | Parmeter Logging & Excavation Inc | Cazadero, CA 95421 | $18,160 |
56 | Victor Leveroni & Sons LLC | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $17,379 |
57 | Buttke Dairy | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $17,300 |
58 | Terry Zimmerman | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $17,279 |
59 | Jerry Norman | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $16,816 |
60 | Nosecchi Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $16,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”