Dairy Programs in Stanislaus County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 651
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $94,950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Manuel Morris | Modesto, CA 95358 | $590,828 |
22 | George Te Velde Jr - The Te Velde Survivor's Trust | Modesto, CA 95356 | $580,993 |
23 | Diamond S Ranch Inc | Waterford, CA 95386 | $571,703 |
24 | S & S Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $567,316 |
25 | Arthur L Silva | Riverbank, CA 95367 | $564,939 |
26 | Eric K Van Vliet Blue Star Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $564,362 |
27 | Alden Peterson & Sons Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $554,291 |
28 | Bar Vee Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $551,853 |
29 | Nelson Farms | Ceres, CA 95307 | $544,853 |
30 | De Carvalho Brothers Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $544,299 |
31 | Wyeth Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $538,719 |
32 | Henriques 2005 Revocable Trust | Modesto, CA 95358 | $536,739 |
33 | Rosie E Omlin | Modesto, CA 95358 | $534,432 |
34 | Elsie King | Turlock, CA 95380 | $533,794 |
35 | Durrer Dairy Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $528,442 |
36 | Ackerman Dairy Inc | Ceres, CA 95307 | $518,857 |
37 | D & M Ag | Denair, CA 95316 | $517,707 |
38 | Gilbert Teixeira | Turlock, CA 95382 | $514,601 |
39 | Frank J Bettencourt & Sons Dairy | Ceres, CA 95307 | $505,032 |
40 | Antone L Gomes & Leonard J Gomes Antone L Gomes & | Newman, CA 95360 | $504,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”