Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Stanislaus County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 71
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $497,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lagorio Ranch Inc | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $6,186 |
22 | Perry & Bassett Cattle Co LLC | Gustine, CA 95322 | $5,695 |
23 | Paul Ichord | Waterford, CA 95386 | $5,559 |
24 | John R Grohl | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $5,201 |
25 | Scott Haydn-myer | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $5,191 |
26 | Joseph D King | Turlock, CA 95380 | $4,997 |
27 | Brennan Cattle Company LLC | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $4,899 |
28 | Philippe Hammerness | Esparto, CA 95627 | $4,798 |
29 | Charles P Stadtler | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $4,764 |
30 | Timothy J Azevedo & Irmalinda L Azevedo Living Tru | Newman, CA 95360 | $4,558 |
31 | Joe B Martin Dba Martin Land & Cattle | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $4,549 |
32 | Conlin Livestock Inc | Stockton, CA 95213 | $4,389 |
33 | Scott P Armstrong | Escalon, CA 95320 | $4,203 |
34 | Steve Haglund | Modesto, CA 95358 | $4,146 |
35 | Jimmy I Mangante Revocable Trust | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $3,523 |
36 | Candace Peterson | Farmington, CA 95230 | $3,427 |
37 | Helga Zuber | Sonora, CA 95370 | $3,204 |
38 | Darlene Hodge | Sonora, CA 95370 | $2,985 |
39 | Will I Bennett | Hickman, CA 95323 | $2,899 |
40 | W W Cox & Sons | Westley, CA 95387 | $2,651 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”