Dairy Programs in Stanislaus County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 651
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $94,950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Surinder K Johal Johal Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $396,649 |
62 | Tony J Morris | Modesto, CA 95358 | $395,827 |
63 | Edelweiss Dairy, LLC | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $394,304 |
64 | Scott Alan Sanders S A S Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $389,958 |
65 | Jose M Silva Langworth Dairy | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $387,030 |
66 | Germann Brothers Dairy | Ceres, CA 95307 | $384,747 |
67 | Michael D Barcellos | Newman, CA 95360 | $383,250 |
68 | Willie & Jolene Bylsma W & J Dairy | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $380,143 |
69 | Joao Salvador | Ceres, CA 95307 | $378,189 |
70 | Tony Meirinho & Sons Dairy Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $376,003 |
71 | J & J Toste Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $372,199 |
72 | Pete Postma Dairy | Empire, CA 95319 | $369,200 |
73 | John Morris Jnm Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $366,434 |
74 | Trinkler Dairy Farms Inc | Ceres, CA 95307 | $365,331 |
75 | Martins Farm Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $360,733 |
76 | Rivercrest Cattle Company | Ripon, CA 95366 | $349,102 |
77 | Manuel Martins Dairy Lp | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $343,826 |
78 | Kevin S Blount | Turlock, CA 95381 | $343,695 |
79 | Meirinho West Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $339,921 |
80 | Luis M Azevedo | Turlock, CA 95380 | $339,633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”