Total Commodity Programs in Stanislaus County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 831
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $38,700,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Meirinho Holsteins Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $138,685 |
62 | Willie & Jolene Bylsma W & J Dairy | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $138,412 |
63 | Handi Nut Farms, LLC | Patterson, CA 95363 | $137,144 |
64 | Verburg & Son Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $136,367 |
65 | Germann Brothers Dairy | Ceres, CA 95307 | $135,782 |
66 | Raymond Lopes Family Trust | Newman, CA 95360 | $134,593 |
67 | Darin Lemos Lockwood III Dairy | Waterford, CA 95386 | $134,378 |
68 | Henriques 2005 Revocable Trust | Modesto, CA 95358 | $134,118 |
69 | Nelson Farms | Ceres, CA 95307 | $133,719 |
70 | Wyeth Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $133,496 |
71 | Vitoria Dairy Lp | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $133,148 |
72 | Albert Mendes Dairy | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $133,041 |
73 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $132,813 |
74 | Triple C Farms LLC | Denair, CA 95316 | $132,590 |
75 | Jordao Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $132,025 |
76 | Ackerman Dairy Inc | Ceres, CA 95307 | $131,797 |
77 | D & M Ag | Denair, CA 95316 | $131,701 |
78 | Jose M Silva Langworth Dairy | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $131,465 |
79 | Meirinho West Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $131,151 |
80 | S & S Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $131,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”