Farm Subsidy information
Stanislaus County, California
Total Subsidies in Stanislaus County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 431
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $49,290,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Machado Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $141,417 |
82 | , | $140,633 | |
83 | Verburg & Son Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $140,144 |
84 | Meirinho Holsteins Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $139,222 |
85 | Raymond Lopes Family Trust | Newman, CA 95360 | $138,781 |
86 | Couchman Farms | Modesto, CA 95358 | $138,521 |
87 | Frank J Bettencourt & Sons Dairy | Ceres, CA 95307 | $138,399 |
88 | Nutcher Farms LLC | Denair, CA 95316 | $138,367 |
89 | Van Der Hoek & Sons Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $137,865 |
90 | Alden Peterson & Sons Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $137,834 |
91 | , | $137,748 | |
92 | Arthur L Silva | Riverbank, CA 95367 | $137,247 |
93 | Luis M Azevedo | Turlock, CA 95380 | $136,830 |
94 | Joe Meirinho & Son Dairy, Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $136,361 |
95 | Azevedo Dairy Inc | Patterson, CA 95363 | $135,507 |
96 | Henriques 2005 Revocable Trust | Modesto, CA 95358 | $135,457 |
97 | Wyeth Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $135,417 |
98 | Durrer Dairy Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $135,381 |
99 | Manuel Martins Dairy Lp | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $135,094 |
100 | James D Meikle Jr | Modesto, CA 95358 | $134,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”