Counter Cyclical Program in Stanislaus County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 475
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $4,686,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Hilltop Holsteins | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $18,018 |
82 | Vierra Bros Dairy, Lp | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $17,946 |
83 | Al D Bairos | Modesto, CA 95357 | $17,790 |
84 | Silva Bros Enterprise Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $17,644 |
85 | Albert And Eleanor Brindeiro 1981 | Turlock, CA 95380 | $17,485 |
86 | Nelson Farms | Ceres, CA 95307 | $17,418 |
87 | Deniz Farming | Modesto, CA 95355 | $17,158 |
88 | Raymond Alger | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $17,120 |
89 | Germano Or Jacinta Soares | Turlock, CA 95380 | $16,870 |
90 | Jeff Dykzeul | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $16,512 |
91 | Wyeth Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $16,442 |
92 | Carl J Vieira | Turlock, CA 95381 | $16,382 |
93 | Laurie Vieira | Turlock, CA 95381 | $16,382 |
94 | Alvernaz Dairy Inc | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $16,221 |
95 | Gregory M Nunes | Modesto, CA 95358 | $16,122 |
96 | Mcfarlane Farms | Turlock, CA 95380 | $16,028 |
97 | August Martin | Farmington, CA 95230 | $15,979 |
98 | Hector R Centeno | Escalon, CA 95320 | $15,832 |
99 | Antonio Alberto | Hickman, CA 95323 | $15,673 |
100 | Manuel S Machado | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $15,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”