Total Conservation Programs in Stanislaus County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 265
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $3,149,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | George Espindula | Turlock, CA 95380 | $11,640 |
82 | Zylstra Dairy Farms Inc | Friedens, PA 15541 | $11,467 |
83 | Ferreira Bros | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $11,354 |
84 | Del Puerto Farms Inc | Patterson, CA 95363 | $11,181 |
85 | Hayes & Lucas Enterprises Inc | Waterford, CA 95386 | $10,650 |
86 | Edward A Machado | Ripon, CA 95366 | $10,560 |
87 | Nick Stokman | Modesto, CA 95358 | $10,500 |
88 | Frank A Trinta | Patterson, CA 95363 | $10,500 |
89 | Raspo Farms | Banta, CA 95304 | $10,500 |
90 | John Campo | Patterson, CA 95363 | $10,275 |
91 | Douglas C Stephens | Newman, CA 95360 | $10,171 |
92 | Filbert Bettencourt | Patterson, CA 95363 | $10,054 |
93 | Marvin Scott | Turlock, CA 95380 | $9,839 |
94 | Walter Betschart | Modesto, CA 95356 | $9,649 |
95 | Isabel M Machado | Turlock, CA 95380 | $9,500 |
96 | Don & Harold Agresti | Ceres, CA 95307 | $9,433 |
97 | Ed Lara Inc | Patterson, CA 95363 | $9,203 |
98 | Robert Scheppmann | Farmington, CA 95230 | $9,183 |
99 | Don Fantazia | Hickman, CA 95323 | $9,000 |
100 | Brichetto Cattle Co | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $9,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”