Farm Subsidy information
Stanislaus County, California
Total Subsidies in Stanislaus County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 431
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $49,290,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Azevedo Farms | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $134,284 |
102 | Carvalho Farms | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $134,117 |
103 | Darin Lemos Lockwood III Dairy | Waterford, CA 95386 | $133,967 |
104 | Edelweiss Dairy, LLC | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $133,914 |
105 | Nelson Farms | Ceres, CA 95307 | $133,681 |
106 | De Carvalho Brothers Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $133,485 |
107 | Neil M Souza | Newman, CA 95360 | $133,319 |
108 | Joseph M Murray Jr | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $133,121 |
109 | Jordao Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $132,755 |
110 | Connie Machado Jv | Atwater, CA 95301 | $132,642 |
111 | Rosie E Omlin | Modesto, CA 95358 | $132,145 |
112 | Deniz Bros Ag Services Inc | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $132,056 |
113 | John Morris Jnm Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $131,857 |
114 | Surinder K Johal Johal Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $131,238 |
115 | Danny Brasil | Turlock, CA 95380 | $131,065 |
116 | Carlos Estacio III | Ceres, CA 95307 | $130,813 |
117 | Lemos Jerseys | Waterford, CA 95386 | $130,655 |
118 | , | $129,717 | |
119 | John Zylstra | Turlock, CA 95380 | $128,963 |
120 | Jose M Silva Langworth Dairy | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $128,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”