Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Stanislaus County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 161
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $1,218,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Randall G & Daniel M Saso Saso Fa | Modesto, CA 95358 | $4,521 |
102 | , | $4,342 | |
103 | , | $4,221 | |
104 | Bradley W Deboer | Modesto, CA 95357 | $3,968 |
105 | Marcus Haney | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $3,962 |
106 | Garrett L Bowman | Modesto, CA 95358 | $3,936 |
107 | , | $3,730 | |
108 | Hampton Qualified Trust W | Hickman, CA 95323 | $3,581 |
109 | Hickman Hills Partners | Hughson, CA 95326 | $3,291 |
110 | Arlberg Partnership | Hickman, CA 95323 | $3,201 |
111 | Hack Farms Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $3,158 |
112 | Matthew Toste | Modesto, CA 95355 | $3,152 |
113 | Kevin Heath | Patterson, CA 95363 | $2,978 |
114 | Albert Rossini Limited | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $2,949 |
115 | Foletta Farms Inc | Williams, CA 95987 | $2,909 |
116 | Agostino F Verdone | Hughson, CA 95326 | $2,647 |
117 | Dev&t Farming LLC | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $2,605 |
118 | Everett B Souza Jr | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $2,600 |
119 | Michael M Machado | Chinese Camp, CA 95309 | $2,492 |
120 | Stanley J Swanson | Turlock, CA 95380 | $2,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”