Market Loss Assistance Program in Stanislaus County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 502
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $12,175,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Claribel Farms | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $34,512 |
142 | Ollimac Dairy Inc | Denair, CA 95316 | $34,512 |
143 | Azevedo Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $34,512 |
144 | Clarot Farms Inc | Ceres, CA 95307 | $34,512 |
145 | Ramos Dairy | Turlock, CA 95381 | $34,512 |
146 | Genasci Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $34,512 |
147 | Zylstra Dairy Farms Inc | Friedens, PA 15541 | $34,512 |
148 | Diamond S Ranch Inc | Waterford, CA 95386 | $34,512 |
149 | Peder Hoy Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $34,512 |
150 | Silva Family Dairy Inc | Denair, CA 95316 | $34,512 |
151 | Wyeth Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $34,512 |
152 | De Carvalho Brothers Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $34,512 |
153 | Edwin H Smith & Sons | Denair, CA 95316 | $34,512 |
154 | Dan Soares | Turlock, CA 95380 | $34,512 |
155 | Antonio Martins | Newman, CA 95360 | $34,512 |
156 | Joe Oliveira | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $34,512 |
157 | Albert Mendes Dairy | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $34,512 |
158 | Areias & Martinho Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $34,512 |
159 | De Visser Bros | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $34,512 |
160 | Antone L Gomes & Leonard J Gomes Antone L Gomes & | Newman, CA 95360 | $34,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”