Production Flexibility Program in Stanislaus County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 239
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $4,793,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Mary Ann Moran | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $3,610 |
162 | Mendonca Family 2007 Trust | Turlock, CA 95380 | $3,590 |
163 | Jake Oosterman | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $3,547 |
164 | Coelho Dairy | Modesto, CA 95357 | $3,535 |
165 | Theodore Koch | Escalon, CA 95320 | $3,524 |
166 | Stuart J Smith Farms Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $3,515 |
167 | William K Henriques Jr Revocable | Modesto, CA 95358 | $3,487 |
168 | Shirley M Michener Living Trust | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $3,385 |
169 | Dorothea Williams Trust | Windsor, CA 95492 | $3,297 |
170 | Gary R Michener | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $3,269 |
171 | Unknown | Turlock, CA 95380 | $3,112 |
172 | Roger D Smith | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $3,002 |
173 | Kieth Steadman | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $2,993 |
174 | Mary Wolf | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $2,844 |
175 | Joao Correia | Modesto, CA 95357 | $2,768 |
176 | Lyons Land & Cattle Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $2,696 |
177 | David Celli | Stockton, CA 95215 | $2,624 |
178 | Estate Of Raymond Nikolauson | Kirkwood, CA 95646 | $2,594 |
179 | Machado Ranch | Modesto, CA 95358 | $2,257 |
180 | Henry Sakakura | Stockton, CA 95215 | $2,218 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”