Farm Subsidy information

Stanislaus County, California

Total Subsidies in Stanislaus County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,403

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanislaus County, California totaled $634,592,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21George Te Velde Jr - The Te Velde Survivor's TrustModesto, CA 95356$1,801,770
22Edwin H Smith & SonsDenair, CA 95316$1,746,126
23Tony F Melo & Sons IncTurlock, CA 95380$1,644,273
24Carl J VieiraTurlock, CA 95381$1,638,379
25Joao H BrasilTurlock, CA 95380$1,630,603
26H & M Agresti Trust AgreementCeres, CA 95307$1,571,267
27Laurie VieiraTurlock, CA 95381$1,564,351
28Diamond S Ranch IncWaterford, CA 95386$1,560,504
29Lumar Dairy FarmsTurlock, CA 95380$1,551,780
30Jordao DairyTurlock, CA 95380$1,545,407
31Manuel MorrisModesto, CA 95358$1,531,974
32Joe B Martin Dba Martin Land & CattleOakdale, CA 95361$1,514,531
33Ratto Bros IncModesto, CA 95358$1,500,000
34Valley Aglands IncModesto, CA 95358$1,485,568
35Melvin T Wheeler & Sons LpModesto, CA 95358$1,475,255
36Fiscalini Farms LpModesto, CA 95358$1,450,748
37A & A Cattle Co LLCOakdale, CA 95361$1,436,104
38Soares Dairies LpTurlock, CA 95380$1,420,557
39D & M AgDenair, CA 95316$1,419,295
40Eric K Van Vliet Blue Star DairyModesto, CA 95358$1,419,218

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag