Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 978
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $29,058,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stephens Ranch Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $174,785 |
22 | Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $173,657 |
23 | Dale Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $172,736 |
24 | Fedora Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $164,126 |
25 | Richland Enterprises LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $159,566 |
26 | Wilmax Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $159,123 |
27 | Danna & Danna Inc | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $152,464 |
28 | Bhungal & Bhungal | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $146,246 |
29 | M-r Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $142,844 |
30 | Raghbir Singh Atwal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $141,783 |
31 | Richard Wilson | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $140,756 |
32 | Harpreet S Mann | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $139,291 |
33 | Heiman & Kay B Cheim Trust | Marysville, CA 95901 | $138,453 |
34 | Sohan Singh Atwal & Sons | Woodland, CA 95776 | $138,099 |
35 | Bhatti Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $137,948 |
36 | Sundeep Dale | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $137,365 |
37 | Js Johal & Sons | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $132,732 |
38 | Jagmail & Randeep Dulai | Elk Grove, CA 95624 | $132,056 |
39 | Santokh Dosanjh | Sacramento, CA 95835 | $130,888 |
40 | Mukhi Chand Sharma | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $129,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”