Total Emergency Relief Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 436
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $32,076,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Salinder K Kang | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $250,000 |
22 | Joseph P Mitchell | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $250,000 |
23 | Ideal Walnut Co Inc | Burlingame, CA 94011 | $250,000 |
24 | , | $250,000 | |
25 | Manbirpaul Dhillon | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $246,352 |
26 | , | $246,000 | |
27 | B E Giovannetti & Sons | Woodland, CA 95695 | $219,965 |
28 | Harmon Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $217,895 |
29 | Fortune Farmstead Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $210,780 |
30 | Fiveway Inc | Sutter, CA 95982 | $210,365 |
31 | , | $199,819 | |
32 | Judge Farm LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $198,763 |
33 | Krehe & Krehe | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $197,098 |
34 | Hudson Orchards LLC | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $197,008 |
35 | William A Driver Rev Trust | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $196,307 |
36 | Kuldip Singh Thiara | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $189,579 |
37 | Sarbjit Thiara Jr | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $187,727 |
38 | Bains Bros Farms LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $184,105 |
39 | Jaspreet Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $171,412 |
40 | Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $171,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”