Total Emergency Relief Program in Sutter County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 133
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $14,736,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kuldip Singh Thiara | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $189,579 |
22 | Harmon Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $180,560 |
23 | Ronald Smith | Rescue, CA 95672 | $162,200 |
24 | Surjit Singh Rahul | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $160,421 |
25 | Jaspreet Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $159,590 |
26 | Ideal Walnut Co Inc | Burlingame, CA 94011 | $143,940 |
27 | Sutter Buttes Nursery, Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $134,822 |
28 | Vinod Ohri | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $130,987 |
29 | Fedora Farms Inc | Meridian, CA 95957 | $126,492 |
30 | Paul Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $125,000 |
31 | Steven & Sandra Devalentine Family Trust | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $125,000 |
32 | Sarbjit S Basrai | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $125,000 |
33 | Ajab Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $125,000 |
34 | Windswept Orchards LLC | Elk Grove, CA 95758 | $125,000 |
35 | Jagir S Gill | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $125,000 |
36 | Jubilant Earth Nurseries Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $125,000 |
37 | Regency Ranch LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $125,000 |
38 | Fortune Farmstead Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $125,000 |
39 | , | $125,000 | |
40 | Pelger Road 1700 LLC | Manteca, CA 95336 | $125,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”