Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 149
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $1,142,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Suneel Sharma | Dixon, CA 95620 | $11,875 |
22 | Surjit Singh Rahul | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
23 | Oji Bros Farm Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $11,875 |
24 | Steven & Sandra Devalentine Family Trust | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $11,875 |
25 | Taresh Farms Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $11,875 |
26 | Paulsen White Oak L P | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $11,875 |
27 | Ronald Smith | Rescue, CA 95672 | $11,875 |
28 | Harmon Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
29 | Joseph P Mitchell | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $11,875 |
30 | Royal Land LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $11,875 |
31 | Devalentine Orchards Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $11,875 |
32 | West Wheatland Inc | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $11,875 |
33 | Jagir S Gill | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $11,875 |
34 | Vinod Ohri | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $11,875 |
35 | Jubilant Earth Nurseries Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $11,875 |
36 | Regency Ranch LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
37 | Dba Dailey Family Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
38 | Post Rev Trust - John Post | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
39 | Balbir S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
40 | Khera Orchards LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”