Farm Subsidy information
Sutter County, California
Total Subsidies in Sutter County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 390
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $31,020,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Fruetel Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $104,863 |
| 42 | Alexander C Magenheimer | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $104,120 |
| 43 | J & M Farms A Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $101,695 |
| 44 | Baten Farming LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $100,573 |
| 45 | Montna Farms, A Community Property Farm | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $98,914 |
| 46 | La Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $96,285 |
| 47 | Piara Gosal | Gridley, CA 95948 | $93,832 |
| 48 | K & J Partnership | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $92,903 |
| 49 | Double D Farms | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $92,729 |
| 50 | Penning Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $91,799 |
| 51 | Zenda Farms Inc | San Bruno, CA 94066 | $91,791 |
| 52 | Snake Creek Ranch Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $90,499 |
| 53 | , | $90,063 | |
| 54 | Jeffrey Catlett Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $89,968 |
| 55 | Charanjit & Shangara Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $86,743 |
| 56 | Fortune Farmstead Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $85,780 |
| 57 | Mcpherrin-damboriena Sheep Co | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $85,673 |
| 58 | Quinterland Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $85,259 |
| 59 | G P J Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $85,205 |
| 60 | Twin Peaks Ag Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $81,818 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
