Total Emergency Relief Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 436
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $32,076,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Strachan Apiaries Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $169,539 |
42 | Stephen And Debra Tarke Farms, Lp | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $166,450 |
43 | Surjit Singh Rahul | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $164,356 |
44 | Ronald Smith | Rescue, CA 95672 | $162,200 |
45 | Kalkat Brothers Land Company | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $156,251 |
46 | M & H Farming Enterprises | Folsom, CA 95630 | $154,184 |
47 | Rick B Heryford | Sutter, CA 95982 | $153,288 |
48 | Michael & Kim Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $150,008 |
49 | Sjb Farms LLC | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $146,118 |
50 | Jaspal Orchards | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $140,568 |
51 | Harbhajan S Takher & Sons | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $137,686 |
52 | Fedora Farms Inc | Meridian, CA 95957 | $136,440 |
53 | Sutter Buttes Nursery, Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $134,822 |
54 | Siller Brothers Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $133,666 |
55 | Vinod Ohri | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $130,987 |
56 | Park Farming | Meridian, CA 95957 | $129,502 |
57 | Bruce Peacock | Sutter, CA 95982 | $128,384 |
58 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $125,696 |
59 | Gurjit Singh Gosal | Gridley, CA 95948 | $125,000 |
60 | Paul Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $125,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”