Market Loss Assistance Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 834
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $60,761,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hunt Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $261,608 |
42 | Live Oak Rice Farm | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $260,305 |
43 | Penning Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $250,395 |
44 | L & N Farms | Robbins, CA 95676 | $247,838 |
45 | Stephen & Debra Tarke Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $246,252 |
46 | Fred & Evelyn Zielesch Partnershi | Woodland, CA 95695 | $240,829 |
47 | Muddy Water Ent | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $235,800 |
48 | Rice Farms Partnership | Houston, TX 77227 | $228,433 |
49 | Alfred & Gail Montna J V | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $226,518 |
50 | Michael & Kim Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $221,986 |
51 | Jeff & Gigi Pierce | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $215,234 |
52 | Brown & Brown | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $214,541 |
53 | Brugmann And Son | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $212,776 |
54 | Circle S Ranch | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $209,716 |
55 | American Farms | Gridley, CA 95948 | $209,004 |
56 | Rice Plus | Nevada City, CA 95945 | $205,775 |
57 | Boeger - Boeger | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $204,392 |
58 | Franklin Group | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $198,439 |
59 | Jason Farms | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $197,243 |
60 | Dougherty Brothers | Robbins, CA 95676 | $188,315 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”