Farm Subsidy information
Sutter County, California
Total Subsidies in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 521 to 540 of 3,318
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $806,775,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
521 | Mark A Evans | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $311,542 |
522 | Michael Thomas Millar | Glenn, CA 95943 | $310,769 |
523 | M-r Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $310,592 |
524 | Ron Ward | Rocklin, CA 95677 | $310,313 |
525 | Kuldip Singh Thiara | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $310,048 |
526 | Joseph P Mitchell | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $308,855 |
527 | Tomio Wakida | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $308,716 |
528 | Judge Farm LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $308,519 |
529 | Mary Etcheverry | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $308,281 |
530 | Caitlin Mcgeoghegan Butler | Robbins, CA 95676 | $307,525 |
531 | George Aoki Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $305,387 |
532 | Daryl Lauppe | Sacramento, CA 95841 | $304,875 |
533 | Dennis Gallagher | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $304,770 |
534 | C And V Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $304,610 |
535 | Ronald Smith | Rescue, CA 95672 | $303,635 |
536 | Dennis Wilson Farms Inc | Colusa, CA 95932 | $302,985 |
537 | Harms And Scheiber | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $302,905 |
538 | Jt Ag | Roseville, CA 95661 | $301,151 |
539 | Harold Giyer | Meridian, CA 95957 | $300,340 |
540 | Michael Tarke | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $299,760 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”