Farm Subsidy information
Sutter County, California
Total Subsidies in Sutter County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 390
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $31,020,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Anthony Giusti | Chico, CA 95973 | $81,254 |
62 | Filter Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $81,119 |
63 | G A Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $80,899 |
64 | , | $80,798 | |
65 | Perminder Bains | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $77,955 |
66 | , | $75,509 | |
67 | Great Oak Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $74,654 |
68 | Nelson Family Farms Inc | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $74,403 |
69 | Sucha Singh | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $72,032 |
70 | Shannon Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $71,801 |
71 | Tokaneke Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $70,138 |
72 | Gallagher Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $69,699 |
73 | Smud Co | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $66,773 |
74 | Gill Ranch Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $65,957 |
75 | Sukhraj Singh Pamma | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $64,772 |
76 | Jaismin Kaur Pamma | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $64,772 |
77 | Harbhajan S Takher & Sons | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $64,368 |
78 | Jagpal Johl | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $64,126 |
79 | Ma2h Gp | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $63,440 |
80 | Gurjit Takher | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $63,164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”