Market Loss Assistance Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 834
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $60,761,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John & Catherine Klein | Woodland, CA 95695 | $187,634 |
62 | Tamita Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $186,437 |
63 | Doherty Brothers | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $184,464 |
64 | Hatcher Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $179,773 |
65 | Leo Michel And Sons | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $177,584 |
66 | Quad Farms Partnership | Meridian, CA 95957 | $176,729 |
67 | Sheehy & Cress Ranch | Sacramento, CA 95825 | $176,560 |
68 | Krehe Murray Farming | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $174,144 |
69 | R & R Schmidl | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $173,798 |
70 | M & J Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $172,894 |
71 | Coon Creek Ranch | Sacramento, CA 95819 | $171,358 |
72 | Diamond J Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $170,347 |
73 | J & A Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $169,364 |
74 | L T Farms | Trowbridge, CA 95659 | $166,234 |
75 | Rimlander Farms | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $162,947 |
76 | Rai Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $162,341 |
77 | Hi-power Farming | Marysville, CA 95901 | $157,284 |
78 | C & P Duck Co | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $156,056 |
79 | Schmidt Farms | Redding, CA 96001 | $155,594 |
80 | F E R Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $155,563 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”