Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Sutter County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 103
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $686,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | North Side Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $3,644 |
62 | Piara Gosal | Gridley, CA 95948 | $3,631 |
63 | Harmun Takhar | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $3,400 |
64 | Jan Wing Dyer | Woodland, CA 95776 | $3,397 |
65 | Chohan & Sons Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $3,303 |
66 | Mangat Ram | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $3,190 |
67 | Manjit Chahal | Gridley, CA 95948 | $3,168 |
68 | Richard W Campbell Jr | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,934 |
69 | Jeffrey E Dyer | Woodland, CA 95776 | $2,822 |
70 | Jaspreet Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,663 |
71 | Charanjit S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,629 |
72 | Mumtaz Shergill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,608 |
73 | Kuldip Singh Thiara | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $2,588 |
74 | Amritsar Land | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,526 |
75 | Gurnanak Singh | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,418 |
76 | Inderpal S Mayall | Sacramento, CA 95835 | $2,290 |
77 | Balbir S Pooni | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,252 |
78 | Bruce Peacock | Sutter, CA 95982 | $2,106 |
79 | Scrivner Hoppe-glosser | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $2,088 |
80 | Balraj S Rai | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,052 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”