Farm Subsidy information
Sutter County, California
Total Subsidies in Sutter County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 390
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $31,020,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Narinder Singh Rai | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $62,662 |
82 | Suneel Sharma | Dixon, CA 95620 | $62,383 |
83 | Diamond J Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $61,597 |
84 | Robert & Martha Devalentine Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $60,261 |
85 | Waters Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $59,998 |
86 | Kashmir Gill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $59,343 |
87 | Manuel Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $58,644 |
88 | Linear Farming Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $58,074 |
89 | Enterprise Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $57,911 |
90 | Surjit S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $57,301 |
91 | Muddy Water Ent | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $56,878 |
92 | Michael Tarke | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $56,868 |
93 | Sarbjit S Dhoot | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $56,104 |
94 | N & M Ranches Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $55,598 |
95 | Satvinder Gill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $55,211 |
96 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $55,163 |
97 | Mora Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $55,013 |
98 | Eric C Furlan | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $54,794 |
99 | Tarke Ranch LLC | Sutter, CA 95982 | $54,404 |
100 | Paula Raub | Sutter, CA 95982 | $54,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”