Deficiency Payment in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 717
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $33,600,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | B E Lynch & Sons Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $90,216 |
82 | Wrong Id Number Faxon | Colusa, CA 95932 | $90,077 |
83 | B L Family Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $89,920 |
84 | H A Bennett | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $89,835 |
85 | S B Anderson Trust | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $89,643 |
86 | Mike Gibson | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $89,559 |
87 | Carol L Thomsen Trust | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $89,556 |
88 | Catherine E Gibson | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $89,490 |
89 | John J Amarel | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $89,385 |
90 | Greg Leiser Farms Inc | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $89,135 |
91 | Devalentine Farms Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $89,063 |
92 | Larry Sohrakoff | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $88,837 |
93 | James J Sohrakoff | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $88,306 |
94 | Phillip A Sohrakoff | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $88,296 |
95 | David Creps Rev Trust | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $87,830 |
96 | Tarke Cousins | Meridian, CA 95957 | $87,700 |
97 | Aaron Scheidel | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $87,468 |
98 | R & B Family Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $87,378 |
99 | Kathy Magenheimer | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $86,647 |
100 | Robert C Magenheimer | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $86,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”