Total Emergency Relief Program in Sutter County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 366
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $17,340,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Diamond J Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $61,597 |
82 | Robert & Martha Devalentine Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $60,261 |
83 | Waters Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $59,998 |
84 | Kashmir Gill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $59,343 |
85 | Manuel Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $58,644 |
86 | Linear Farming Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $58,074 |
87 | Enterprise Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $57,911 |
88 | Surjit S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $57,301 |
89 | Michael Tarke | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $56,868 |
90 | Muddy Water Ent | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $56,756 |
91 | Sarbjit S Dhoot | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $56,104 |
92 | N & M Ranches Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $55,598 |
93 | Satvinder Gill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $55,211 |
94 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $55,163 |
95 | Eric C Furlan | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $54,794 |
96 | Paula Raub | Sutter, CA 95982 | $54,398 |
97 | Mora Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $53,988 |
98 | Brugmann And Son | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $53,790 |
99 | Acorn Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $53,276 |
100 | Chesini Farms Inc | Meridian, CA 95957 | $50,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”