Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Sutter County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 103
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $686,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Brian Bole | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,043 |
82 | Dalvir S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,028 |
83 | Evans Farming Ag Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,909 |
84 | J & W Nut Buyers | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,901 |
85 | Jagtar Madare | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,892 |
86 | Karnail Tumber | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,825 |
87 | Frances Kelli Evans | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,569 |
88 | Amanjit S Dhoot | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,536 |
89 | Mandeep Singh Johl | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,501 |
90 | Marie Vanzandt-geoia | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $950 |
91 | Daniel Mccracken | Sutter, CA 95982 | $878 |
92 | Dunbar Orchards | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $633 |
93 | Guillermo Pulido | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $599 |
94 | Surinder Singh | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $557 |
95 | Regis D Kunz | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $363 |
96 | Craig Hendy | Sutter, CA 95982 | $357 |
97 | Lorna Hanson | Placerville, CA 95667 | $338 |
98 | Jim Stewart | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $302 |
99 | Starmer Properties | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $279 |
100 | Thomas Hanson | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”