Deficiency Payment in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 717
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $33,600,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | George H Reusser | Marysville, CA 95901 | $85,493 |
102 | Rdv Farms Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $85,010 |
103 | Leo Michel And Sons | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $84,958 |
104 | Linear Farming Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $84,879 |
105 | E D Willey & Sons | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $84,761 |
106 | Crane And Cross Books Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $84,523 |
107 | Kevin Driver | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $84,349 |
108 | D & G Farms | Woodland, CA 95695 | $84,275 |
109 | Frank Alonso Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $84,043 |
110 | Michael Ettl | Meridian, CA 95957 | $83,596 |
111 | Nuevo Farms | Sacramento, CA 95841 | $83,568 |
112 | Lauppe And Son | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $83,538 |
113 | Siller Brothers Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $83,482 |
114 | Tolorain Farms Inc | Penn Valley, CA 95946 | $82,854 |
115 | Nicole Montna Van Vleck | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $82,812 |
116 | Thomas A Cuquet | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $82,778 |
117 | Great Oak Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $82,489 |
118 | C Bruce Mace Rch Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $82,359 |
119 | Brett Scheidel | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $82,008 |
120 | The Vestal Family Trust | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $81,522 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”