Direct Payment Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,307
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $164,189,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Richard Nelson | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $404,485 |
102 | Clara May Nelson | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $404,470 |
103 | Deborah Martynski | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $403,962 |
104 | Gregory E Driver | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $402,807 |
105 | Richter Bros Inc | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $402,522 |
106 | Paulsen White Oak L P | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $400,486 |
107 | Linear Farming Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $397,656 |
108 | William A Driver Rev Trust | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $395,984 |
109 | Brannon Construction Inc | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $393,912 |
110 | Yank Farms Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $392,919 |
111 | Cynthia T Giusti | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $391,192 |
112 | Kirk Giusti | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $391,192 |
113 | William F Hofman | Artois, CA 95913 | $384,494 |
114 | Karen M Penning | Robbins, CA 95676 | $383,223 |
115 | Robert L Penning | Robbins, CA 95676 | $382,683 |
116 | Circle S Ranch | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $381,227 |
117 | R & B Family Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $379,946 |
118 | Joe And Cleo Schreiner Farming | Woodland, CA 95695 | $378,079 |
119 | Devorah Heffley | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $371,838 |
120 | Heinrich Magenheimer | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $371,821 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”