Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 710
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $9,838,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Double D Farms | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $25,057 |
102 | Royal Land LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $24,950 |
103 | Dnh Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $24,934 |
104 | John Heier | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $24,773 |
105 | J S Johal And Sons Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $24,659 |
106 | Bell Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $24,430 |
107 | Martin & Susan Lund Farming Co | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $24,383 |
108 | Dilbagh S Family Rev Trust A | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $24,367 |
109 | Deanna Moroni Dba Moroni Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $24,334 |
110 | Tim Moroni Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $24,206 |
111 | Daddow & Sons Farming | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $23,929 |
112 | Moroni Farming & Leasing Inc | Sutter, CA 95982 | $23,665 |
113 | Joe's Girls | Woodland, CA 95695 | $23,217 |
114 | E C Nelson Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $23,107 |
115 | Tejpaul Johl LLC | Henderson, NV 89052 | $23,068 |
116 | Mike J De Ree | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $23,019 |
117 | Clayton Goodman | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $23,003 |
118 | Diamond J Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $22,965 |
119 | Judge Farm LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $22,864 |
120 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $22,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”