Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 149
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $1,142,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jaspreet Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,663 |
102 | Charanjit S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,629 |
103 | Mumtaz Shergill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,608 |
104 | Kuldip Singh Thiara | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $2,588 |
105 | Karnail Tumber | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,539 |
106 | Amritsar Land | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,526 |
107 | Inderpal S Mayall | Sacramento, CA 95835 | $2,290 |
108 | Balbir S Pooni | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,252 |
109 | Amarjit Sohal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,143 |
110 | Balraj S Rai | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,052 |
111 | Brian Bole | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,043 |
112 | Dalvir S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,028 |
113 | Jaspal Gill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,930 |
114 | Evans Farming Ag Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,909 |
115 | J & W Nut Buyers | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,901 |
116 | Bgh Lp | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,898 |
117 | Felicia Nicole Alvarez | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,581 |
118 | Frances Kelli Evans | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,569 |
119 | Amanjit S Dhoot | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $1,536 |
120 | Mandeep Singh Johl | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”