Deficiency Payment in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 717
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $33,600,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Vestal Survivors '15 Trust | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $81,522 |
122 | Mora Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $81,456 |
123 | Julian H Rolufs | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $81,392 |
124 | Albert Fruetel Dba Fruetel Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $81,363 |
125 | Hal W Haughey | Marysville, CA 95901 | $81,187 |
126 | Bjr Farms Inc | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $80,620 |
127 | Kt Farming Inc | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $80,620 |
128 | Devorah Heffley | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $80,155 |
129 | Tammie Richardson | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $80,155 |
130 | Roma Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $80,041 |
131 | Kenneth Micheli | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $80,025 |
132 | Sills Farms Inc | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $79,860 |
133 | Quad-h Ranches Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $79,821 |
134 | Jack Alves | Woodland, CA 95695 | $79,637 |
135 | Steven Carter Revocable Trust | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $79,466 |
136 | Frank & Carol Rosa Jv | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $79,168 |
137 | Nock Farm Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $78,605 |
138 | Agrivest Corp | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $78,184 |
139 | Ronald D Phelps | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $78,166 |
140 | Connie Jerome | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $78,166 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”