Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 710
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $9,838,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Davric Farms | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $22,713 |
122 | Hunt Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $22,654 |
123 | Kenneth Micheli | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $22,644 |
124 | Nevada Smith | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $22,546 |
125 | Lynette Smith | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $22,546 |
126 | Mdm Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $22,162 |
127 | Dnh Farms LLC | Sacramento, CA 95818 | $21,887 |
128 | Taresh Farms Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $21,842 |
129 | Dhillon Brothers | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $21,839 |
130 | Kashmir Gill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $21,754 |
131 | Gkc Farming | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $21,754 |
132 | Thomas Heier | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $21,681 |
133 | Brugmann And Son | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $21,652 |
134 | E & N Morello Farms | Marysville, CA 95901 | $21,510 |
135 | Richard W Campbell Jr | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $21,158 |
136 | Virginia D Van Dyke Family Trust | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $21,150 |
137 | Circle C Farms Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $20,654 |
138 | Shaeffer Ranch LLC | Clovis, CA 93619 | $20,617 |
139 | Harmon Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $20,482 |
140 | Anderson Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $20,131 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”