Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 710
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $9,838,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Manuel Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $20,102 |
142 | Jagjit Sandhu | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $19,729 |
143 | Jagdeep Ohri | Folsom, CA 95630 | $19,637 |
144 | A D G Holland Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $19,448 |
145 | Dennis Michel Farms Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $19,281 |
146 | Lyndol Swartz Farming | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $18,837 |
147 | B E Giovannetti & Sons | Woodland, CA 95695 | $18,813 |
148 | Charles J Roberts | Sutter, CA 95982 | $18,657 |
149 | Surjit Gill | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $18,444 |
150 | Manbirpaul Dhillon | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $18,141 |
151 | John & Catherine Klein | Woodland, CA 95695 | $17,933 |
152 | Dale Investments LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $17,854 |
153 | Rice Farms Partnership | Houston, TX 77227 | $17,714 |
154 | Smith Ranch | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $17,596 |
155 | James Bruce Spilman | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $17,348 |
156 | Derby Orchards | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $17,272 |
157 | Aaron & Karen Scheidel Joint Venture | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $16,995 |
158 | Hoffart Trust | Robbins, CA 95676 | $16,815 |
159 | Harmun Takhar | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $16,813 |
160 | Miller-singh Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $16,776 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”