Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,583
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $555,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Catlett Family Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $941,469 |
142 | Moroni Farming & Leasing Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $940,831 |
143 | River Ranch Partnership | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $939,587 |
144 | Bjr Farms Inc | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $933,774 |
145 | Roberta M Schreiner | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $932,971 |
146 | F E R Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $931,729 |
147 | J A B Farms Inc | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $925,941 |
148 | Kevin Driver | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $920,040 |
149 | Lisa Magenheimer Alves | Woodland, CA 95695 | $917,459 |
150 | Diane Hawkins | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $915,374 |
151 | Filiberto Vargas | Sacramento, CA 95838 | $912,484 |
152 | Mdm Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $907,528 |
153 | Marcuse Colony Farms | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $905,855 |
154 | John Lucich | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $898,594 |
155 | Bryant Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $895,325 |
156 | Elsye De Martini | Woodland, CA 95695 | $895,051 |
157 | Cynthia T Giusti | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $893,503 |
158 | Tammie Richardson | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $886,295 |
159 | Barry Lemenager | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $885,610 |
160 | Roger L Matteoli | Robbins, CA 95676 | $885,034 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”