Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 710
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $9,838,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Allen E Jaschke | Meridian, CA 95957 | $16,409 |
162 | Surjit Singh Rahul | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $16,311 |
163 | Guillermo Pulido | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $16,133 |
164 | Waters Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $15,774 |
165 | Brian C Mckenzie | Plumas Lake, CA 95961 | $15,711 |
166 | Neill Mitchell Ranch | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $15,695 |
167 | Yank Farms Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $15,538 |
168 | Mike Chesini Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $15,528 |
169 | W E & J G Merkley | Roseville, CA 95661 | $15,487 |
170 | J & J Catlett Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $15,409 |
171 | Brad Foster | Marysville, CA 95901 | $15,407 |
172 | Jarvis E Cole | De Kalb, MS 39328 | $15,330 |
173 | Andrew E Jansen | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $15,160 |
174 | Thomas T Joaquin Jr | Penn Valley, CA 95946 | $15,134 |
175 | Cynthia T Giusti | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $15,125 |
176 | Kirk Giusti | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $15,125 |
177 | Manseena Orchards Gp | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $15,098 |
178 | Amritsar Land | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $15,019 |
179 | Tamra S Nelson | Newcastle, CA 95658 | $14,973 |
180 | Greg Nelson | Newcastle, CA 95658 | $14,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”