Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 2,583
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $555,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Westrope Ranches LLC | Grand Junction, CO 81507 | $882,296 |
162 | Steven W Carter | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $881,207 |
163 | Riverbend Ranch Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $878,305 |
164 | Danny Schreiner | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $876,734 |
165 | E D Willey & Sons | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $874,405 |
166 | Sunrise Orchards | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $868,387 |
167 | Alan Hawkins | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $867,781 |
168 | Richard Nelson | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $866,784 |
169 | Clara May Nelson | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $866,769 |
170 | Rai Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $861,700 |
171 | Hi-power Farming | Marysville, CA 95901 | $861,382 |
172 | Thomas A Cuquet | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $860,849 |
173 | B Chris Mckenzie | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $852,805 |
174 | Kathy Magenheimer | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $851,062 |
175 | Robert C Magenheimer | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $850,033 |
176 | Mark Moroni | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $849,309 |
177 | Brannon Construction Inc | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $847,014 |
178 | Brian J Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $840,735 |
179 | Sparkle Farms Inc | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $840,716 |
180 | River Basin Ranch Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $837,843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”