Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,583
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $555,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Jopson Ranch | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $835,935 |
182 | Buka Farms Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $835,128 |
183 | Frank & Carol Rosa Jv | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $828,941 |
184 | Peacock & Sons | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $828,560 |
185 | Matthew E Brugmann | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $827,512 |
186 | Scott Leathers | Woodland, CA 95695 | $827,320 |
187 | Neal M Siller | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $826,912 |
188 | Dale Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $819,940 |
189 | Mike Gibson | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $819,380 |
190 | Nock Farm Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $813,909 |
191 | Richard W Powell Revocable Trust | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $810,603 |
192 | H A Bennett | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $809,507 |
193 | P & W Farms | Sacramento, CA 95836 | $809,135 |
194 | Debbie Carter | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $807,299 |
195 | Bill Henderson | Marysville, CA 95901 | $805,726 |
196 | Emile Furlan & Son | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $805,350 |
197 | Isidro Zavala | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $804,958 |
198 | Catherine E Gibson | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $797,958 |
199 | John Scheiber | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $796,032 |
200 | Stephanie J Siller | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $774,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”