Farm Subsidy information
Sutter County, California
Total Subsidies in Sutter County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 471
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $16,292,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Devalentine Orchards Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $65,487 |
22 | Golden Valley Orchards LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $62,500 |
23 | Van Dyke Brothers | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $57,893 |
24 | Dhillon Farm LLC | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $57,262 |
25 | Penning Family Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $55,638 |
26 | Filter Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $51,411 |
27 | B & B Livestock | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $49,971 |
28 | Murphy Lake Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $49,726 |
29 | Mcpherrin-damboriena Sheep Co | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $48,771 |
30 | Robert & Martha Devalentine Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $45,771 |
31 | Everglade Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $41,868 |
32 | Sukhdev & Manjit Purewal Gp | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $35,873 |
33 | Ecne Inc | Gridley, CA 95948 | $35,618 |
34 | Kimura Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $34,086 |
35 | Takhar Ranch LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $33,289 |
36 | Surjit Singh Rahul | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $33,066 |
37 | Montna Farms, A Community Property Farm | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $32,449 |
38 | Penning Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $32,136 |
39 | Michael & Kim Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $31,578 |
40 | Tule Basin Farms LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $31,432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”