Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Sutter County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 531
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $5,428,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Joe And Cleo Schreiner Farming | Woodland, CA 95695 | $30,830 |
| 42 | Guy Harris Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $30,532 |
| 43 | Bains Bros Farms LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $30,058 |
| 44 | Stephens Ranch Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $28,987 |
| 45 | Enterprise Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $28,579 |
| 46 | Micheli Fam Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $27,858 |
| 47 | Bryant Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $27,234 |
| 48 | La Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $27,121 |
| 49 | Michael Tarke | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $25,770 |
| 50 | Nelson Family Farms Inc | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $25,409 |
| 51 | Tendoor Farms Partnership | Durham, CA 95938 | $25,265 |
| 52 | Four Leaf Farms LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $25,165 |
| 53 | Shannon Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $24,379 |
| 54 | Hawn Ranch Co | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $24,364 |
| 55 | Michael & Kim Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $24,011 |
| 56 | Sun Valley Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $23,783 |
| 57 | M & H Farming Enterprises | Folsom, CA 95630 | $23,325 |
| 58 | Five Way Farming | Sutter, CA 95982 | $23,233 |
| 59 | Nar Heer Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $23,126 |
| 60 | Didar Singh | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $22,587 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf