Farm Subsidy information
Tehama County, California
Total Subsidies in Tehama County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 214
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $21,235,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Grant Leininger | Vina, CA 96092 | $146,127 |
22 | Franklin Andersen | Vina, CA 96092 | $141,421 |
23 | Oscar Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $140,327 |
24 | Zuppan Dairy Partnership | Orland, CA 95963 | $132,332 |
25 | Sugargrass LLC | Dairy, OR 97625 | $130,727 |
26 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $128,130 |
27 | Bradshaw Cattle Company LLC | Eagle Point, OR 97524 | $124,481 |
28 | , | $122,385 | |
29 | , | $119,417 | |
30 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $117,932 |
31 | Andersen & Sons Ranch Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $116,912 |
32 | Candace Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $112,450 |
33 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $108,915 |
34 | Nick P Sohrakoff Jr | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $105,119 |
35 | Michael Patrick Wallace | Chico, CA 95973 | $104,118 |
36 | Broken Ridge LLC | San Ramon, CA 94582 | $100,387 |
37 | Tom Burrill | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $92,016 |
38 | Humphrey Ranch Inc | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $90,938 |
39 | Kramer Ranch LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $90,666 |
40 | , | $90,333 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”