Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 141
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $2,910,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chambers Joint Venture | Artois, CA 95913 | $41,580 |
22 | Paul W Sutfin | Corning, CA 96021 | $38,068 |
23 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $37,066 |
24 | Andersen & Sons Ranch Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $34,617 |
25 | A&m Farming LLC | Vina, CA 96092 | $32,945 |
26 | Jones & Son LLC | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $30,879 |
27 | James & Pamela Wilson Revocable Trust | Orland, CA 95963 | $29,672 |
28 | Golden Valley Farms Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $29,296 |
29 | Anchordoguy Kaye LLC | Vina, CA 96092 | $29,199 |
30 | Lindauer River Ranch Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $28,736 |
31 | Abbey Ranch Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $28,222 |
32 | Mag Farms, Inc - Dfhb | Corning, CA 96021 | $27,010 |
33 | North Valley Partners 3 Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $23,528 |
34 | Brandon Chapla | Corning, CA 96021 | $23,316 |
35 | West River Farms LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $22,028 |
36 | Duck Pond Orchards LLC | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $21,585 |
37 | Antonio Reis Belo | Orland, CA 95963 | $21,572 |
38 | Giving Trees Partnership | Orland, CA 95963 | $20,592 |
39 | Russell Harman | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $20,165 |
40 | Vanella-moore Partnership | Chico, CA 95928 | $19,978 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”