Market Loss Assistance Program in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 192
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $4,297,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kevin Borror | Gerber, CA 96035 | $48,778 |
22 | Kenneth R Heiber | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $48,365 |
23 | Peggy Marenco | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $48,184 |
24 | Alvin Marenco | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $48,184 |
25 | Scott A Tall | Tehama, CA 96090 | $45,835 |
26 | Charles A Orwick III Trust Of 200 | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $43,999 |
27 | Tehama Angus Ranch Inc | Gerber, CA 96035 | $41,718 |
28 | Butler Investments Inc | Santa Clarita, CA 91380 | $41,272 |
29 | D R Vestal Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $37,991 |
30 | Robert D Fumasi Family Trust | Orland, CA 95963 | $35,944 |
31 | Elmer Fobian | Willows, CA 95988 | $34,551 |
32 | Gilbert L Alston | Orland, CA 95963 | $34,512 |
33 | Ramiro Ferreira | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $34,512 |
34 | Richard R Walker | Orangevale, CA 95662 | $34,512 |
35 | John Zuppan | Orland, CA 95963 | $34,512 |
36 | Albert Wackerman | Orland, CA 95963 | $34,512 |
37 | Gabriel Martin | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $34,512 |
38 | Arie Poldervaart | Orland, CA 95963 | $34,512 |
39 | H Stephen Richardson | Corning, CA 96021 | $34,512 |
40 | Robert R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $34,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”