Direct Payment Program in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 200
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $7,323,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Waitsburg Farms LLC, A California | Alameda, CA 94502 | $51,603 |
42 | Robert R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $51,211 |
43 | Kenneth R Heiber | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $50,143 |
44 | Charles A Orwick III Trust Of 200 | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $48,652 |
45 | Slaven Family Revocable Trust | Zamora, CA 95698 | $48,594 |
46 | Mike D Foley Ranch | Corning, CA 96021 | $48,339 |
47 | Edwards Ranch | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $47,479 |
48 | Peggy Marenco | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $46,947 |
49 | Williams Ranch | Corning, CA 96021 | $46,690 |
50 | Daniel And Amie Charter | Williams, CA 95987 | $46,572 |
51 | Drt Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $45,007 |
52 | Antelope Creek Cattle Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $44,314 |
53 | Ramiro Ferreira | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $44,149 |
54 | Marenco Cattle Company Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $43,298 |
55 | Kevin Cheda | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $41,626 |
56 | Joquetta Redamonti | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $37,620 |
57 | Ferro Family Trust | San Rafael, CA 94901 | $37,055 |
58 | Anchordoguy & Kaye | Chico, CA 95928 | $34,046 |
59 | George A Myer | Redding, CA 96002 | $31,953 |
60 | Barnes Cattle Company Inc | Julian, CA 92036 | $31,487 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”